When The Washington Post wanted local perspective on the publication of leaked reports from the autopsy of Michael Brown, the 18-year-old shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Mo., they turned to community newspaper editor Chris King.
King is managing
editor of The St. Louis American, the largest weekly newspaper in Missouri and
one of the best African-American newspapers in the U.S. Over the last two
weeks, he has been an outspoken critic of the Post and The New York Times,
both of which published the autopsy leaks in late October. The leaks seem to suggest
that Darren Wilson, the police officer who shot and killed Brown in August,
will not face criminal charges. The protests and riots touched off by Brown’s shooting
have received international media attention.
King told the Los Angeles Times a law enforcement source had offered him the autopsy
reports, but he decided not to run them. In the Post article, King was
quoted as saying he suspected the publication of the leaks could touch off more
violence on the streets of Ferguson, an idea that was echoed in an American
editorial the same week. That editorial read, in part:
The Times and Post ran with this anonymous third-party hearsay regarding a high-stakes case that has our entire region on edge. Tensions are so high that preparations for riots, if Wilson walks free, are discussed in sober terms in local and national media and on street corners. The editors of these powerful publications have shown a lapse in judgment and ethics that is not only shameful, but actually dangerous.
This week
the American covered protesters upset with the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch’s publication of the leaked autopsy details.
Aggressive
reporting and public commentary on matters such as the leaked autopsy reports are nothing new for the
American. The newspaper has provided pointed, comprehensive coverage of the
social unrest in Ferguson, Mo., since Brown’s shooting.
Other news
organizations have taken note of that coverage. In August, King was featured in
stories published by Poynter and The New Yorker. The International Society ofWeekly Newspapers announced last week that King and other American staffers
will discuss their approach to the story during the 2015 ISWNE conference in
Columbia, Mo. In the last month, King
has developed into a go-to source for Washington Post reporters covering Ferguson.
If you
haven’t already done so, visit the American’s website and read what the newspaper's staff and contributors have
to say. The editorials and columns show us how a local newspaper can take a
strong stand for its community and provide a platform for people whose voices
often aren’t heard.
Addressing
riots in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, the newspaper’s editorial
board encouraged the community “to
channel its anger more productively than what transpired on the streets.” The
newspaper called for prosecutor Bob McCulloch to recuse
himself from the investigation into whether Wilson should face criminal charges.
In the same editorial, the newspaper accused Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon of “political
cowardice” for not forcing McCulloch to step aside.
More
recently, editorials (such as this one and this one) encouraged residents to take on
broader social systems that reinforce racial inequality. The newspaper has also opened its pages to
guest columnists who have critiqued the handling of Brown’s shooting at the
local level and discussed broader social issues it reflects.
No comments:
Post a Comment